<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 5 Minutes With…. Choo Zheng Xi on PM Lee’s interview</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/</link>
	<description>a community of singaporeans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 08:21:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: SGDaily Roundup: Week 16 &#171; The Singapore Daily</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26428</link>
		<dc:creator>SGDaily Roundup: Week 16 &#171; The Singapore Daily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Apr 2008 04:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26428</guid>
		<description>[...] the next Prime Minstar - Hard Hitting in the Lion City: Successor Question - The Online Citizen: 5 Minutes With…. Choo Zheng Xi on PM Lee’s interview - The Daily Backtrack: PM Lee, protector of meritocracy - nofearSingapore: Voting with the feet is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the next Prime Minstar &#8211; Hard Hitting in the Lion City: Successor Question &#8211; The Online Citizen: 5 Minutes With…. Choo Zheng Xi on PM Lee’s interview &#8211; The Daily Backtrack: PM Lee, protector of meritocracy &#8211; nofearSingapore: Voting with the feet is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26313</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26313</guid>
		<description>Yes, check and balance...
http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/06/01/auditor-general’s-report-millions-missing/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, check and balance&#8230;<br />
<a href="http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/06/01/auditor-general’s-report-millions-missing/" rel="nofollow">http://theonlinecitizen.com/2007/06/01/auditor-general’s-report-millions-missing/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pisces</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26312</link>
		<dc:creator>pisces</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:19:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26312</guid>
		<description>The key issue is whether there are sufficient checks and balances in the political system to ensure that the government (formed by whatever party) is accountable, non-corrupt and protects fundamental rights of the citizens. 

The current operating assumptions by the PAP (and shared by Singaporeans at large) are that it will
1) continue to find and select the right people to join the government;
2) remain non-corrupt; and 
3) remain in power perpetually. 

As a result, there has been a lack of focus on developing the necessary checks and balances in the system. If and when one of the assumptions break down, we may find ourselves in deep trouble...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The key issue is whether there are sufficient checks and balances in the political system to ensure that the government (formed by whatever party) is accountable, non-corrupt and protects fundamental rights of the citizens. </p>
<p>The current operating assumptions by the PAP (and shared by Singaporeans at large) are that it will<br />
1) continue to find and select the right people to join the government;<br />
2) remain non-corrupt; and<br />
3) remain in power perpetually. </p>
<p>As a result, there has been a lack of focus on developing the necessary checks and balances in the system. If and when one of the assumptions break down, we may find ourselves in deep trouble&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macktheknife</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26280</link>
		<dc:creator>macktheknife</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26280</guid>
		<description>Hearing so much from you guys, we can&#039;t exactly say PAP is doing all that badly. Just to raise the tempo of the discussion - Last night, a Taiwan TV program caught my attention which appraises Singapore for having the best government in the world. The host and the some of the Professors cum Political Representatives agrees that they admire LKY for his works done on Singapore and its system that keeps us competitive. The issue of whether President Ma is able to emulate LKY is immaterial. I&#039;m totally honored and proud to be a Singaporean. Now, after the past few days, we have been criticizing PAP for this and that. My question is: Are our opposition parties capable of doing better? Do we really think PAP is lousy? Come on, lets be frank with each other. I am not a PAP supporter, but rather, I support the Worker&#039;s Party because I wanted more balance. If the opposition parties are not up to the task, I rather keep the current system and move on in life. How say?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hearing so much from you guys, we can&#8217;t exactly say PAP is doing all that badly. Just to raise the tempo of the discussion &#8211; Last night, a Taiwan TV program caught my attention which appraises Singapore for having the best government in the world. The host and the some of the Professors cum Political Representatives agrees that they admire LKY for his works done on Singapore and its system that keeps us competitive. The issue of whether President Ma is able to emulate LKY is immaterial. I&#8217;m totally honored and proud to be a Singaporean. Now, after the past few days, we have been criticizing PAP for this and that. My question is: Are our opposition parties capable of doing better? Do we really think PAP is lousy? Come on, lets be frank with each other. I am not a PAP supporter, but rather, I support the Worker&#8217;s Party because I wanted more balance. If the opposition parties are not up to the task, I rather keep the current system and move on in life. How say?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackson</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26253</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 11:34:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26253</guid>
		<description>I think the PAP should wake up their idea and realise that now is 2008 and Singapore is very transparent to the world. How long can LKY live on? 100? LKY was born in 1923, I&#039;m born in 1986, so I&#039;ve got another 50 years to play. By then, will PAP still be around? As a Singaporean, I&#039;m disgraced that Singaporeans like the PAP don&#039;t understand politics. When it&#039;s time to rotate the party, it&#039;s time to rotate. Die die wanna stay at the top, eventually will come down.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the PAP should wake up their idea and realise that now is 2008 and Singapore is very transparent to the world. How long can LKY live on? 100? LKY was born in 1923, I&#8217;m born in 1986, so I&#8217;ve got another 50 years to play. By then, will PAP still be around? As a Singaporean, I&#8217;m disgraced that Singaporeans like the PAP don&#8217;t understand politics. When it&#8217;s time to rotate the party, it&#8217;s time to rotate. Die die wanna stay at the top, eventually will come down.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert HO</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26241</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert HO</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 05:48:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26241</guid>
		<description>Dear EY Comment 19,

1.  The Constitution is online, last time I checked, because I asked once in an online forum -- and the PAPs heard -- why this most important piece of legalese was not online and shortly after, it was.  But you will never find a single clause that states this possibility of a voted-out PAP MP or Minister waltzing back into the Cabinet.  LIE KY LHL PAP are too dishonest to state that explicitly since it is their backdoor route back into power and millions -- big motivations for greedy and corrupt men like them.

2.  Rather, you will have to note that THERE ARE NO DISQUALIFICATIONS OR PROHIBITIONS FOR A NOMINATED MP BEING MADE A MINISTER.  So, this carefully created backdoor is never mentioned in the PAPaganda media or by the PAPs themselves but they all know the possibility.  Remember LIE KY kept warning about &quot;freak elections results&quot;?  So he prepared for this 1.  Just like calling out the army if the entire PAP govt is voted out.  Preparations long made and contingent plans worked out, who does what to whom, etc.

3.  In the Constitution, the Nominated MP has the same legal and parliamentary status as an elected MP, except for pay [allowance] and some voting restrictions, I believe.  So any NMP can become Minister or even PM.  So &quot;freak results&quot; prepared for.

4.  I had a short exchange of emails with Warren? Fernandez of the Straits Times years ago in which he admitted and acknowledged this possibility and he is 1 of those trusted and in the know; also in the right circles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear EY Comment 19,</p>
<p>1.  The Constitution is online, last time I checked, because I asked once in an online forum &#8212; and the PAPs heard &#8212; why this most important piece of legalese was not online and shortly after, it was.  But you will never find a single clause that states this possibility of a voted-out PAP MP or Minister waltzing back into the Cabinet.  LIE KY LHL PAP are too dishonest to state that explicitly since it is their backdoor route back into power and millions &#8212; big motivations for greedy and corrupt men like them.</p>
<p>2.  Rather, you will have to note that THERE ARE NO DISQUALIFICATIONS OR PROHIBITIONS FOR A NOMINATED MP BEING MADE A MINISTER.  So, this carefully created backdoor is never mentioned in the PAPaganda media or by the PAPs themselves but they all know the possibility.  Remember LIE KY kept warning about &#8220;freak elections results&#8221;?  So he prepared for this 1.  Just like calling out the army if the entire PAP govt is voted out.  Preparations long made and contingent plans worked out, who does what to whom, etc.</p>
<p>3.  In the Constitution, the Nominated MP has the same legal and parliamentary status as an elected MP, except for pay [allowance] and some voting restrictions, I believe.  So any NMP can become Minister or even PM.  So &#8220;freak results&#8221; prepared for.</p>
<p>4.  I had a short exchange of emails with Warren? Fernandez of the Straits Times years ago in which he admitted and acknowledged this possibility and he is 1 of those trusted and in the know; also in the right circles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I want the next SG PM to be a web2.0 junkie! &#124; the(new)mediaslut</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26213</link>
		<dc:creator>I want the next SG PM to be a web2.0 junkie! &#124; the(new)mediaslut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 15:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26213</guid>
		<description>[...] course I want the next SG PM to go beyond kissing babies, I want him/her to be a web2.0 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] course I want the next SG PM to go beyond kissing babies, I want him/her to be a web2.0 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CelluloidReality</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26203</link>
		<dc:creator>CelluloidReality</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 12:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26203</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not buying the idea of a single party dominant political position in Singapore for the next 20-30 years. 

It&#039;s not tenable and frankly, the wider the scope of political participation and liberalisation to allow for greater ownership and less schadenfreude in domestic politics, the greater the effect this has on enhancing our existence for the long term. 

What&#039;s afflicting Singapore is the current state of its socio-political dynamics. 

Who&#039;s up for public service? Wait, do I see hands going down. 

Yeap, I do. And I roughly know why. 

But I hope more are able to reckon the missives involved.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not buying the idea of a single party dominant political position in Singapore for the next 20-30 years. </p>
<p>It&#8217;s not tenable and frankly, the wider the scope of political participation and liberalisation to allow for greater ownership and less schadenfreude in domestic politics, the greater the effect this has on enhancing our existence for the long term. </p>
<p>What&#8217;s afflicting Singapore is the current state of its socio-political dynamics. </p>
<p>Who&#8217;s up for public service? Wait, do I see hands going down. </p>
<p>Yeap, I do. And I roughly know why. </p>
<p>But I hope more are able to reckon the missives involved.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elfred</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26201</link>
		<dc:creator>Elfred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 10:29:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26201</guid>
		<description>Zheng Xi,

I have waited for this topic to be &#039;old&#039; to quietly tell you that... Your &#039;analysis&#039; is wrong lah~ :)

Trust me...

As for the next PM, it&#039;d probably not be someone in parliament right now. After MM Lee, will there be another MM is a question in itself. Hahahahahaha...

Given the future, the succeeding PM, for the sake of the party and Singapore, he/she must be excellent in politics, yet must be young enough to pull a regime off for enough time for internal and external confrontation.

The Law minister&#039;s appointment is a show for all to realise the essence of political appointment: From the bottom to the top, or from the top falling to bottom... anything can happen. The signal is very strong.

There is no need to guess. In politics, and if pragmatism must be, the coming political appointments will be astonishing. No choice, the global scene is changed, the domestic matters are changed drastically; but Singaporeans...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Zheng Xi,</p>
<p>I have waited for this topic to be &#8216;old&#8217; to quietly tell you that&#8230; Your &#8216;analysis&#8217; is wrong lah~ <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>Trust me&#8230;</p>
<p>As for the next PM, it&#8217;d probably not be someone in parliament right now. After MM Lee, will there be another MM is a question in itself. Hahahahahaha&#8230;</p>
<p>Given the future, the succeeding PM, for the sake of the party and Singapore, he/she must be excellent in politics, yet must be young enough to pull a regime off for enough time for internal and external confrontation.</p>
<p>The Law minister&#8217;s appointment is a show for all to realise the essence of political appointment: From the bottom to the top, or from the top falling to bottom&#8230; anything can happen. The signal is very strong.</p>
<p>There is no need to guess. In politics, and if pragmatism must be, the coming political appointments will be astonishing. No choice, the global scene is changed, the domestic matters are changed drastically; but Singaporeans&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EY</title>
		<link>http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/2008/04/15/5-minutes-with%e2%80%a6-choo-zheng-xi-on-pm-lee%e2%80%99s-interview/#comment-26197</link>
		<dc:creator>EY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 08:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theonlinecitizen.wordpress.com/?p=735#comment-26197</guid>
		<description>Hi Robert,

That&#039;s news! Is it possible for you to direct us to the relevant sections of the Constitution please? Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Robert,</p>
<p>That&#8217;s news! Is it possible for you to direct us to the relevant sections of the Constitution please? Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
