a community of singaporeans

“We’ll be in a very very sorry state.”

Posted by theonlinecitizen on August 17, 2007

By Andrew Loh

‘We can’t have a situation where we protect you even from yourself. If the entire population needs to be protected from their own choices, then we will be in a very, very sorry state in the future.’

Minister for Community, Youth and Sports, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan during the debate on the casino issue. (Nov 17, 2004, Straits Times)

In recent times, it seems that the government is adopting schemes which run counter to the principle espoused by Dr Balakrishnan above. Namely, that Singaporeans be allowed to make their own choices and not be subjected to government legislation to do so.

The recent spate of announcements about “opt-out” and “compulsory” participation in certain schemes perhaps is a worrying trend. Worrying because it gives the impression that the government would rather take the easy way out through legislation to get Singaporeans to “participate” in government-led schemes.

And that Singaporeans are increasingly being deprived of making choices for themselves, a point which Dr Balakrishnan took pains to elaborate on when debating the casino issue.

The latest of such schemes is the proposed compulsory purchase of annuities for all Singaporeans. (link) This is part of the government’s multi-pronged approach to addressing the ageing and retirement issue.

It is unclear if the scheme will eventually have an opt-out option for those who do not wish to participate, but in 2005, when it was first brought up, an option to opt out was mentioned:

“The CPF Board is developing programmes to teach CPF members about annuities, and encourage more members to take them up. One way is to change the default option to annuities for all members upon retirement, unless the member specifically decides to opt out.” (TODAY, “New pension plan in works: PM”)

Opt-out schemes are not new.


The government instituted legislation in 1987 for what is known as the Human Organ Transplant Act (HOTA). According to the NKF’s website:

“This Act presumes that non-Muslim Singaporeans and Permanent Residents between 21 and 60 (age-wise), who die in accident, have pledged to donate their kidneys upon death, unless they opt-out in their lifetime.”

On the 1st of July 2004, the government expanded the Act to include other organs, such as corneas and livers, besides kidneys.


In September 1992, the Chinese Development Assistance Council (CDAC) made it compulsory for all working Chinese Singaporeans to contribute a monthly stipend to the council. (link) This ranged from $0.50 to $1.00, depending on your income level.

Singaporeans who do not wish to make such a contribution had to opt-out of the scheme.

MUIS – Majlis Ugama Islam Singapura or Islamic Religious Council Of Singapore – also has a similar scheme. Called the Mosque Building And Mendaki Fund (MBMF), all muslim workers (including PRs and foreign workers) are required to contribute a monthly amount – ranging from $2 to $11.

A muslim employee can opt out of the scheme by submitting “his request in writing to MUIS, after which a certificate will be issued to him. The employee shall, with the certificate, notify his employer who will then cease to make the contribution.(link)

There are similar schemes (with the opt out option) for SINDA and the ECF – Singapore Indian Development Association and the Eurasian Community Fund, respectively.


“Launched in 2002, ElderShield is a severe disability insurance scheme to help Singaporeans pay for their long-term step-down care if they become severely disabled.(MOH)

The contributions will end at age 65 but the coverage is for life. As of 2006, about 750,000 people have ElderShield policies offered by NTUC Income and Great Eastern Life. (CNA ) Those who do not wish to be on the plan will have to opt out.


In a TODAY newspaper report, March 16, 2005, it was reported that Great Eastern Life Assurance and NTUC Income Insurance Co-operative will take over the Central Provident Fund Board’s (CPFB) term-life insurance scheme known as the Dependants’ Protection Scheme or DPS.

The DPS is an opt-out plan meant to provide basic coverage for CPF members
in the event of death or permanent incapacity.

According to the NTUC Income website:

“As long as you are a Singaporean or a permanent resident between 16 to 60 years and currently have CPF contributions, you are automatically insured under DPS.”

Again, those who do not wish to be on the scheme have to apply to opt out. (The NTUC Income website has an opt out form here.)


What is perhaps noticeable is that in 2007, more such schemes were introduced and implemented.

In March 2007, it was announced that all new-born babies will be automatically covered under Medishield – unless the parents opt out of it.

According to a TODAY report (Mar 7, 2007), the scheme will be extended to children below age seven and also to older children:

“This means, they will have insurance cover should a medical emergency strike. A similar opt-out scheme is planned for children below the age of seven when they register for Primary One, while a one-off exercise is planned for older students.” (“Medishield to reach out to all newborns”)

(See also the Parliamentary report here)

In April 2007, the Spam Control Bill was introduced in parliament, which makes “it an offence for companies to send out bulk advertisements or offers to people who have not previously agreed to receive them.” (CNA)

This piece of legislation is peculiar in that it puts the onus on subscribers to unsubscribe to spam contents which is something most people do not want anyway:

“Users who do not want to continue receiving spam must unsubscribe. All businesses sending out such messages must provide such an avenue, structured in a “consumer-friendly” fashion, and act on requests to unsubscribe within 10 days.” (TODAY, April 13, 2007)

Effectively, members of the public have to opt out if they do not wish to receive spam!

In July 2007, MUIS proposed the inclusion of all muslims under the Human Organ Transplant Act. (CNA)

“Its fatwa or religious ruling committee has come up with a position that it is permissible for Muslims to come under the Act. This would mean that Muslims who do not want to have their organs harvested after death, will have to opt out of the scheme.”

More recently, on August 3rd 2007, Health Minister Khaw Boon Wan was reported to have said that his ministry is “considering having opt-out HIV screening tests for male adults at hospitals. “ (CNA)

Opt out schemes unfortunately, in my view, are not restricted to the government. Businesses have adopted such schemes in various forms. One can do a google and see these schemes or as my colleague Sze Hian mentioned here, opt out schemes are even being implemented for donations to charity events!

Explaining policies after legislating

A friend of mine was telling me the other day how different it is nowadays. “In the past, our MPs and government would come personally to your house, enquire about your well-being and took time to explain things to you. But now, they just legislate and you have to go to them if you disagree!”

“Well, the government – and MPs – still take time to explain policies, but after they have legislated”, I replied.

While no one doubts that opt out schemes have their benefits – especially when it is done for the greater good and involve people who are perhaps not as well-informed – what we should be also mindful of is that it does not make Singaporeans so ignorant or apathetic that they just leave everything to the government.

This would run counter to what the government is trying to do – that is, to built an inclusive society and one which every Singaporean is well-informed and given space to make their own choices.

The government itself must keep in mind that taking time and making effort – before implementing legislation – to consult and explain policies are a necessary and important part of governance.

Otherwise, Dr Balakrishnan’s prediction may indeed come true.

We will be in a very very sorry state.

When the State starts making personal choices for us.

“My own sense of it is Singapore is now a much more mature society and, generally, the vast majority of Singaporeans can be trusted to make up their own minds, exercise their choices and act responsibly.”

“The fundamental question is, are we ready as a society to let people make choices of their own, take responsibility for their actions and face the consequences?”

Minister for Community, Youth and Sports, Dr Vivian Balakrishnan during the debate on the casino issue.


6 Responses to ““We’ll be in a very very sorry state.””

  1. Actually ours is a country which has made good progress and could have been carrying on fine by the 19702 given the initial savings by the citizens, good industrialization programs implemented by that time and good public housing.

    Sad to say, from 1970s our leaders have started to change such basic good governance. Instead they kept tinkering with the original pro-people and pro-business and pro-growth model adopted and change it to one where the government on the assumption that citizens are rich and country will perpetually do well treated the people as milking cows from which it only needs to keep milking non-stop in good time or bad time.

    Government began to go into business and compete with citizens for the same economic pie which is no longer enough to grow the private sector economy. Government was no longer interested in lowering costs of living or doing business nor creating conditions conducive to growing vibrancy of citizens and the private sector economy.

    Instead the government for some reasons not supported by substantive research has kept assuming the economy or private citizens are getting rich and can afford to pay the hundreds of thousands in direct and indirect taxes (LTA, HDB) from double charging on lands and infrastructures etc thus plunging the whole private sector economy into doldrum from which it is now still unable or finding it difficult to recover despite the few rich people, the foreign investments and government sector of the economy doing well.

    By sucking monies from the citizens in the above-stated relentless manner, it is creating a situation where the citizens have to depend on the government now including the middle class for some assistances with the costs of living and doing business.

    If we had a more creative and entrepreneurial government from the 1970s, instead of the one which treated citizens as milking cows on assumed success, using legalistic wrangling of laws and regulations to get its way and entrench itself in power, citizens would not have become defenceless and so dependent on government to expect help or assistance.

    Now after creating such a government where even middle class has to plead with government not to jack up the heavy indirect taxes or costs further, the leaders are still saying it is not their fault and people should not expect free lunches etc to get their way.

    So it is clear that root cause must be found. It is not whether citizens have become dependent but whether the government being too obsessed as shown in the foregoing has been sucking too much monies for itself to keep as surpluses like NKF at first under Durai which caused such dependency syndrome being talked about.

    By moderating the autocratic taxing of monies from the people and its top-down legalistic wrangling of laws and regulations to get its way irrespective of problems suffered, ceasing the heavy direct and indirect taxes worsened by a system of corporatising services into GLCs for recovering all costs possible from citizens, Singaporeans can still avoid all the life struggles currently being suffered in silence by many of its citizens.

    So we must understand the root cause of problems and not try to be engaged in intellectualizing and more theorizing about this and that cause.

    The real cause has been found but no one is able to understand and look into the real cause.

    To avoid the 400 suicides by citizens who cannot afford to live due to one-tracked policy of taxing and recovering all possible costs the government can simply hold its hand and declare a moratorium not to increase any more tax or recover too much costs on lands and infrastructures particularly which were already paid by citizens in the first place.

    There is no need for more social engineering as put out by the press media or ministers to check or mould people behaviour or private conduct. There is no need for other studies or remedies which may not help at all but give more excuses to governing leaders to avoid solutions to root cause of problems.

    Just solve the whole problem by taxing less or holding its hand on any more fee or tax increases because what the government is already taxing is more than enough to create surpluses to attract foreign and local investments.

  2. Lai CF said

    Why don’t you print out Vivian’s speech on why Ethnic Quota must be maintained at HDB precincts?

    And MM’s speech on why GRC must be maintained?

  3. All the policies and decisions requiring proper debates in parliament with voting include:

    HOTA (Comatose patient is presumed dead or clinically dead) , GRC, GST Increase without revealing true surpluses from land sales, hidden profits and capital gains by all the GLCs, double-charging on lands (already paid by citizens through taxes) in public housing, triple taxations on vehicle ownership or usage (Import duty, COE, ERP), creation of posts like SM and MM posts to perpetuate politicians’ grip of power without sanctionby parliamentary election process, ministers increasing their own pay (conflicts of interest) without independent assessment of performance, IR, racial quota in allotment of HDB flats etc.

    There is no accountability of government leading to widespread use of legalistic wrangling of laws and regulations through puppet parliament creating resentments by the citizens due to constant abuse of power as seen in many problems created.

    To build an inclusive and cosmopolitan society the first change is to protect the leaders from such unaccountable use of power and make them fully accountable to the citizens.

  4. Quote:’To build an inclusive and cosmopolitan society the first change is to protect the leaders from such unaccountable use of power and make them fully accountable to the citizens.’

    66% of Singaporeans voted for them. All along this is like this in the government of PAP. To change them, Singaporeans have to use their votes wisely. Many do not want to rock this stability in Singapore because they consider the opposition not able to do better than the PAP.

    Just wait for the next general election and see the result.

  5. Keith said

    In its attempt to justify having the casino, the govt says that the citizens are mature enough. They’ll know whether or not to gamble. However, it is a totally different story when it comes to withdrawing our CPF money. The govt says that we will squander our savings if we get everything out. Now,we have to buy annuities, work till 65 in order for them to dispense a few hundred dollars of our own money to us every month. What an irony!

  6. RaymondChua said

    Keith Says:
    “In its attempt to justify having the casino, the govt says that the citizens are mature enough. They’ll know whether or not to gamble.”

    YOu must be kidding to even trust what gov says ! Isn’t gov say it is going to levy $100 entrance fee for Singaporean but free for foreigner tourist to discourage local from gambling to casino ? If indeed gov trust the local, then why charge $100 ? Yet Another PayAndPay scheme to dig money from local ?

    The action are much different from what they say as history has taught us.

    So next time they say more good years, it simply means more good years for them, and more bad years for laymen like me.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: