theonlinecitizen

a community of singaporeans

Uniquely Singapore, F1 or F9: Means testing to help the poor?

Posted by theonlinecitizen on November 1, 2007

By Leong Sze Hian

In the Channelnewsasia report titled “PM Lee suggests hospitals implement means testing to help the poor”, it says: “Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has suggested that hospitals implement means testing to help the lower income group.” (CNA)

Since the reason for increasing the Goods and Services Tax (GST) was to help the poor, why are we now saying that we need to have means testing to help the poor again?

According to media reports, average hospital bills went up by 10 to 30 per cent from 2005 to last year, with the highly subsidised class C wards chalking up the highest percentage increase. (TODAY)

Rising healthcare cost

Those who stayed in class C wards last year paid an average of $1,112 – a 30 per cent leap from 2005’s average of $858. Private patients, who do not receive any subsidies, typically paid 10 per cent more last year compared with 2005.

In contrast to the 30 per cent in class C, the Medifund amount disbursed in 2006 increased by only 3 per cent to $40,513,300, from $39,206,287 in 2005. (MOH)

The cost of healthcare has gone up and may increase some more because polyclinic and hospital fees have increased, means testing is being planned for those staying more than five days in subsidised hospital wards, ElderShield premiums have been increased, and the Singapore Medical Association has withdrawn its fees guidelines.

Means testing started last year for the Early Intervention Programme for Infants and Children (EIPIC) (children with disabilities) and Community Integration Services (CIS) (elderly with disabilities).

Subsidies for permanent residents and foreigners are being reduced or removed, and means testing has been applied since 2000 to elderly step-down care services such as community hospitals, nursing homes, hospices, day rehabilitation centres and home care services.

Government expenditure on healthcare

It is interesting to note from the above that a family household with per capita income of just $301 ($903 household income for three persons) has to pay 50% (50% subsidy) under means testing for elderly step-down care.

The obvious question to ask is: Has “Government Operating Expenditure on Health as a Per Cent of Total Government Operating Expenditure”, been going up too?

According to the Ministry of Health (MOH),

“Government Operating Expenditure on Health as a Per Cent of Total Government Operating Expenditure” for 2005 was 8.1 per cent (as published in DOS Singapore 2006 Statistical Highlights)”.

This is a reversal of the declining trend, which according to the Department of Statistics” (DOS) “Singapore, 1965 – 1995 Statistical Highlights : A Review of 30 Years’ Development”:

“Government Operating Expenditure on Health as a Per Cent of Total Government Operating Expenditure”, declined from 9.5 per cent in 1970 to 7.8 in 1980, and 6.5 in 1990.

However, according to the MOH’s website, Government Health Expenditure/Total Government Expenditure (%), the figure for 2005 was 6.3 per cent.

Why does the DOS data (8.1%) differ so much from the MOH’s data (6.3%)?

May I suggest that MOH corrects this error on its website?

———————–

Read also:

Hospital bills up 10% to 30% across all ward classes. (TODAY)

After 10 years, CGH ups A&E fee. (CNA)

New fee hikes at public hospitals and polyclinics. (Straits Times report)

Who can afford Singapore anymore? (Littlespeck)

July CPI up 2.6% on GST and rental increase. (Straits Times)

———————

Advertisements

6 Responses to “Uniquely Singapore, F1 or F9: Means testing to help the poor?”

  1. […] – Journalism.sg: Who will fill Singapore’s online media vacuum – The Online Citizen: Uniquely Singapore, F1 or F9: Means testing to help the poor? – Yawning Bread: Ake Green and the freedom to monger hate – Chemical Generation Singapore: On […]

  2. Barry Lee said

    Since when do PRs and Foreigners get subsidies in the first place ? Whats the point of being a citizen then?

  3. sarek_home said

    Reduced hospital subsidy for non-citizens.

    Political and economic background

    Singapore has a population of 4.2 million, of which 1 in 4 is not a citizen. There are two categories of non-citizen residents: Permanent Residents (PRs) and other foreigners, including foreign workers. Currently all residents, regardless of citizenship status, receive the same healthcare subsidies at public sector healthcare institutions ranging from 20 to 80 per cent.

    In 2006, Singapore hospitals saw:

    about 10,000 PRs and 10,000 foreign in-patients in Class B2 and C wards, or 9 percent of total subsidised admissions;
    about 4,000 PRs and 3,000 foreign patients registered for subsidised day surgery, or 7 percent of total subsidised day surgeries; and
    about 82,000 PR cases and 60,000 foreign cases for subsidised specialist out-patient clinic treatment (SOC), or 7 percent of total subsidised SOC workload.
    The new move to differentially charge non-citizens is expected to free up about S$36 million (ca. €17.5 million) a year, which the government said will be ploughed back for financing citizens’ care such as elderly care.

  4. family man said

    as I grow old, can I disown my 3 sons so that I need not burden them with the debt of my hospital fees? It is scary that the govt says there are subsidies, but need to wait 3-4 months for an appointment if we are in C ward, but need to pay pte fees to get an immediate appointment. LHL said something about hippocratic oath for Myanmar generals? – full of crap….no money no oath lah..

  5. Ace said

    As King Loong-nidas shouted,”THIS IS SINGAPORE”…… Kicking all the citizens who are unfortunate enough to be born in this land, in the hole…(Remember that scene??)

    Stop all this analysis and Vote with your head, my Singaporeans…..

    By complaining all the time and still voting them in again and again. You have basically signed the blank check for them to screw you in the ass again and again.

    My only question to all of you is this, despite all the propaganda about opposition parties destroy your lives….my point being if you are suffering now as a result of all this policies, then how much worst can the so called “incompetent opposition” make it???

    Worst case scenario, the opposition takes control and goes crazy and thus, they makes “honest mistakes”, produce messy data, retract statements, introduce means testing, increase GST, hike bus fares, give themselves massive salary hikes etc….. I dun know….you guys decide.

    Good luck people….. I am out of this place.

  6. sevenleleven said

    omg….why is it that when the government speaks, it about money and the rise in expenses for Singapore

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: