theonlinecitizen

a community of singaporeans

Election reform effort needs everyone’s involvement – forum

Posted by theonlinecitizen on January 20, 2008

By Andrew Loh

Chaired by the Singapore Democratic Party chairman, Mr Gandhi Ambalam, the election reform public forum at the Allson Hotel focused on getting Singaporeans from all persuasions to be involved in the effort.

The speakers were Mr Chia Ti Lik, Mr JB Jeyaretnam, Mr Jufrie Mahmoud and Dr Chee Soon Juan.

Mr Tan Tarn How, a researcher with the Institute of Policy Studies who was scheduled to be a speaker as well, had “asked to be excused” from the forum, according to Dr Chee.

“Extra-legal, extra-parliamentary” action

Lawyer and member of SG Human Rights, Mr Chia kicked off the forum by focusing his speech on how changes to the election process in Singapore could be effected. “The system is skewed towards whoever is in power”, he said. To seek reform only when one comes into power is the “senseless” way to go, he added.

Thus, he suggested that “extra-legal, extra-parliamentary” means be adopted to attain the goal of reform. Mr Chia clarified that he was not advocating illegal action but that his use of the word “extra” simply meant “outside”.

He also had some scathing remarks about other opposition parties and their MPs. Using terms like “PAP-approved opposition” and “opposition which the PAP is comfortable with”, Mr Chia said “we have to expose PAP apologists among the opposition” and “remind the electorate about these PAP-approved opposition”.

He did not name specifically the opposition parties which he was referring to.

Mr Chia had taken part in the 2006 General Elections as a member of The Workers’ Party’s team which contested East Coast GRC.

5 issues need to be addressed

Mr JB Jeyaretnam spoke about 5 issues which he is concerned about: the fear factor, freedom of information, transparency, funding for political parties and “the blatant intimidation of voters”.

“A government rests on the will of the people”, but “the PAP has been an illegitimate government since 1965”, he said.

Because of these 5 issues, “Singaporeans still harbour this fear of victimization”, and are starved for information, there’s no transparency in our elections, opposition parties are deprived of funds and there was blatant intimidation of voters during elections, he said.

The government has “fine-tuned” the system to produce a “determined” result, which is the return of the PAP to power in every election, says the veteran politician. To overcome this, the 5 issues needed to be addressed in any reform effort, he urged.

Reforming the local media

Mr Jufrie Mahmoud, who took part in the 1991 General Elections in Eunos, focused his address on how to free the minds of Singaporeans from government indoctrination. “When we call for reform, first of all, we should reform the minds of the people”, he said.

“The weakest spot of the PAP is the mind of the people. If they can control your mind, it’s a foregone conclusion that they will win”, he said referring to the People’s Action Party.

Mr Mahmoud then turned his attention to how the media is run in Singapore. “We have in the media so many apologists for the PAP”, he said. He urged that reform of the media should be the first thing which must be addressed.

Suggesting that perhaps “we should call for a campaign against the media”, Mr Mahmoud also urged journalists here “to do their part not for the opposition but for Singapore”.

Coming together

The Singapore Democratic Party’s secretary general, Dr Chee Soon Juan, was the last speaker at the forum. Moving away from criticisms of the PAP, Dr Chee instead spelt out ways through which election reform could be achieved. (See Dr Chee’s speech below.)

Using the projector, he explained a 9-point plan of action.

1. Research best practices

2. Develop website

3. Publish training manual for poll watchers

4. Recruit and train poll watchers

5. Raise awareness

6. Seek support from bloggers

7. Seek international observers – UN, OSCE, IFES, ANFREL

8. Learn from overseas reform campaigns

9. Engage the PMO and the Elections Department

Emphasising that “reform of the election process is not a partisan issue”, Dr Chee called on “government officials, lawyers, women’s groups, youth organisations, journalists,” and opposition parties to come together in the effort.

“After half a century, we’re no closer to denying them a two-third majority”, he said referring to the opposition’s inability to dent the PAP’s number of seats in Parliament.

Although the other parties have declined his invitation to be involved, he said he is not deterred and that he will continue to invite them.

“I cannot emphasise enough how important it is for the opposition to come together in this”, he said.

“We are going to continue to reach out to them because in the first meeting of the first month, we are not going to get an all-encompassing body. But that should not stop us from taking the first step. Once we get that, we will continue to work with the rest, to make sure it becomes a national effort and that this does not discriminate against anyone or any party or any organization.”

Read also: “Opposition moots election reform group” by The Straits Times.

Below is the video of Dr Chee’s reply to theonlinecitizen’s (TOC) question on the prospects of an all-encompassing committee to head the reform agenda, (as mentioned by Dr Chee in an earlier interview with TOC), now that the other opposition parties have declined the SDP’s invitation to be involved.

Dr Chee’s speech, Part One: (Special thanks to watchtowerv)

Dr Chee’s speech, Part Two:

Dr Chee’s speech, Part Three:

 

Advertisements

10 Responses to “Election reform effort needs everyone’s involvement – forum”

  1. JDread said

    Why care if PAP is comfortable with some opposition if they don’t believe in seeking PAP’s endorsement, unless this endorsement is what they want too? It is not what opposition asked for approval or asked to be comfortable. Engage the PMO and the Elections Department? That is like seeking PAP’s endorsement right?

  2. talkcocking said

    Sometimes, hash words may be good for some oppositionists, so that they have no choice but to get out of their comfort zones and start opening their mouths. Post their comments on the internet anytime if the main stream media won’t report them – I don’t really hear much noise even with their Parliamentary immunity.

  3. […] Reform Public Forum – The Online Citizen: Election reform effort needs everyone’s involvement – Sgpolitics: SDP’s public forum on electoral reform, 20 Jan 08 – UncleYap: Public Forum held for […]

  4. ProSG said

    Tell me which oppositionist did not open their mouths. Looks like some opposition without seats are very jealous of those who have them.

  5. Martin Lurther said

    some survey(dunno how reliable) quoted by our unreliable Straits Times claim most Singaporeans consider our elections fair.

    however given the fact that PAP is able to garner at least 66% each election for the last 40 years, nobody can dispute the fact that majority of Singaporeans are not overly unsatisfied with the elections. they may or may not be satisfied but their level of unsatisfaction, if it should exist, is not significant enough to compel them to boycott the elections or not vote for PAP…

    in Hong Kong though a SAR of China, it is still under the prospects of facing severe reaction from China should the Hong Kongers act in any disfavourable manner to China. yet thousands take to the streets to protest. to the Hong Kongers its an ISSUE.

    it remains clear that majority of Singaporeans by and large dont really care about issues such as election fairness, freedom etc. maybe they did about 50 years ago… today its about the material aspects of life that Singaporeans care about… they will only be grossly unhappy enough to protest if you dont deliver Hello Kitty fast in the Macdonald’s queues or if your free textbooks giveaway events are too congested…

  6. Cool Head said

    it is ridiculous for Chia Ti Lik to accuse opposition parties of being “pap approved” and what not. Wasn’t Chia Ti Lik himself a “PAP apologist” in the past? He was a PAP member, right? And wasn’t he also a member of the “PAP approved opposition” as well? He was a WP member too.

    I think the problem with opposition is people like Chia Ti Lik. When things don’t go their way, they start blaming everyone else, including fellow opposition. Just like SDP blame everyone and everything.

    No wonder no opposition turn up for the forum.

  7. Fairenough said

    It is not wrong of Chia Ti Lik to say that because he has resigned. He probably saw something in PAP and WP he didn’t like – not that I agree with him.

    The bigger issue is, either he didn’t do his homework before joining these parties or is someone who lacks judgement. Therefore, I don’t trust his now-positive judgement of SDP – it could become negative in future.

  8. Robert HO said

    RH: Wow! The PAP anonymous apologists are out in force here. So many comments hewing the PAP line. Obvious, isn’t it? Maybe we need to do some self-censorship like the PAP media and censor all these…

  9. No PAP said

    Dear Robert, there’s no PAP apologists around. PAP apologists were seen in that forum. I heard nothing on the evil the PAP has done, instead the whole time was spent bashing opposition parties. I also see someone who said he will quit reading this website but is still here.

  10. OO said

    Robert, the entire SDP slate of speakers were attacking WP and SDA. On the contrary, their words against PAP were not so harsh. Chee even wanted to work with PAP’s election department.

    Naturally, you should expect a lot of opposition supporters (READ ANTI-PAP) to retaliate. It is ironic that the self-claimed real opposition and most confrontational held a forum like a PAP one.

    Chee has the cheek to reach out to other opposition parties after ousting Chiam. And reaching out to WP after his SDP minions openly criticized Sylvia Lim at the IBA conference over her remark that was no reference to them. On the contrary, no other opposition has ever breathed a word on SDP after all his criticisms. Either they are not bothered with him or are more focused on their main enemy PAP.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: