a community of singaporeans

Youths call for right to vote at Youthquake forum

Posted by theonlinecitizen on May 4, 2008

Selene Cheng

“The power of Parliament comes from the people, and the power of the people comes from our right to vote.”

The Workers’ Party Youth Wing (YPYW) launched its inaugural YouthQuake forum series today on the topic “Should Singaporean Youths be Allowed to Vote at 18?”

The public forum, targeted at youths, took place at the party’s headquarters in Syed Alwi Road.

WPYW executive committee member and chairperson of today’s forum Bernard Chen said that the YouthQuake forums aim to “promote greater awareness of youth-centric issues, to promote debate and discussion on issues that affect [youths]”.

Three youths were invited to speak – 17-year old debater Anne Tan, first-year student at Anglo-Chinese Junior College and daughter of WP executive council member Eric Tan; 20-year old full-time National Serviceman Khairulanwar Zaini, and 23-year old Choo Zheng Xi, second-year law undergraduate at the National University of Singapore and the Chief Editor of socio-political blog The Online Citizen.

Speakers generally agreed that Singaporean youths should be allowed to vote at 18, as this would engender political maturity amongst youths and give them a sense of ownership and commitment to the nation. All were confident that youths would exercise their vote responsibly.

“Head knowledge” never really quite hits the heart

First speaker Anne Tan argued that encouraging a culture that allowed vibrant socio-political discourse would make for a more resilient Singapore society, and that giving youths the right to vote would be a formal recognition of the validity of different opinions.

She also argued that if Singapore society did not encourage expression of different opinions for fear of destroying the social fabric, then perhaps the racial and religious harmony that Singapore prides itself on having was just “simply cosmetic”. Anne was of the view that Singapore should not allow the “ghosts” of the pasts – the racial and religious riots in the 60s – to haunt its collective consciousness.

Anne also gave her view on why the Government’s efforts at repoliticising Singapore youths had failed. She argued that in educating youths about national issues, there was a wrong focus on “head knowledge”.

“The thing about head knowledge is that it never really quite hits your heart,” said Anne.

She also felt that the Government’s well-intentioned policies failed because the civil servants that carried out the policies were “entrenched in a cycle of fear” over encouraging political awareness amongst their charges.

A corresponding trust from the state is needed

Second speaker Khairulanwar Zaini spoke on the rights of full-time National Servicemen (NSFs) to vote if they were18, as they were contributing to the defence, and thus protection, of the state’s sovereignty:

I believe that it should be an inherent principle of democracy that we extend suffrage to those who are serving the interests on the nation, in particular for those who provide for the finances and the defence of the state.

Khairul argued that “those serving in the military should have the right to choose the authority that deploys them [for armed combat]”. Citing historical examples of other nations with compulsory conscription, and nations during wartime which had done so, he argued that since the state entrusts its National Servicemen with the heavy responsibility of bearing arms in defence of it, there should be “a corresponding trust to enfranchise [them] into the electorate”.

Additionally, Khairul also argued that citizenship meant obligations and rights, and since in doing National Service male youths at 18 are fulfilling their obligation to defend the nation, they should accordingly be awarded their full rights as citizens as well, which includes the right to vote.

Pre-empting the argument that giving 18-year old National Servicemen suffrage would be “politicising the military”, Khairul stressed that there was a difference between the “rights” of the military as an institution, and the rights of each 18-year old national serviceman. He also noted that if one felt that allowing suffrage would result in a “politicised” military, and that this was unacceptable, that would mean that regular NS men would also have to be denied the vote.

Lastly, Khairul felt that giving NSFs suffrage would give them a “sense of ownership in their country’s affairs”, imbuing them with “a sense of purpose to serve NS”.

To questions from some forum attendees on giving 18-year old females suffrage, Khairul noted that there were many different ways to contribute to the nation, and since 18-year old women also work and pay taxes, they ought to be accorded the same voting rights.

In response to another question as to whether one should allow 16-year old NSFs who were “just as good, just as well, [and] just as brave” to vote, Khairul replied that personally, he felt that the line had to be drawn somewhere, and that this was a minor issue as the number of males voluntarily conscripting themselves at 16 was very low.

Right to vote not guaranteed in law

Last speaker Choo Zheng Xi spoke on how the right to vote was not enshrined in Singapore’s Constitution, and said that Singaporeans were “not familiar with framing [the issue of suffrage] in a rights perspective, but [saw it] instead as a legal obligation”. He noted that it was more a compulsion to act, as the Parliamentary Elections Act stated that non-voters would have their names struck off the electoral register.

Citing legal precedents where the courts affirmed the right of the judiciary to invalidate law inconsistent with the Constitution, Zheng Xi argued that this meant if a law was passed, barring people below a certain intelligence level to vote, such a law could be challenged in court.

“Political engagement is about participation and taking your rights seriously,” said Zheng Xi. “The power of parliament comes from the people, and the power of the people comes from our right to vote”, he said.

Zheng Xi argued that the culture of political apathy has been actively encouraged, and that this mindset had to be changed. Without changing mindsets, changing the law in name would not change the way people think, and their valuing their vote. Nevertheless, he argued that people “[had] to start acting on being the creators of a system that [they wanted] to see, by voting at 18”.

Some forum attendees had some concerns. One asked if giving youths the right to vote at 18 would make a difference, since the current election process was flawed. Another asked if in talking about voting at 18, did one have in mind the general principle that everyone has the right to vote, or was voting rights tied to age.

Speakers were of the view that allowing people to vote at 18 was the first step towards improving the flawed election process, to increase awareness, put aside their fear, and realise that “rights aren’t necessarily confrontational and self-centered” (Zheng Xi).

On the age issue, speakers generally agreed that it was both the age 18 (the age one could get married, buy and drink alcohol legally, and get charged for murder, speakers noted) and the individual right to vote that were equally important. Forum chairperson Bernard Chen noted that a lot of countries were now considering lowering the voting age from 18 to 16, and Singapore was thus lagging behind.

Heartening attendance

The forum closed with each speaker being presented the WP’s anniversary publication as a token of appreciation. WP members The Online Citizen spoke to, including WP chairperson Sylvia Lim, were heartened to see that the forum attracted a fair number of youths among the packed room who were “interested in Singapore’s future”, and all supported the idea of youths being allowed to vote at 18.

“Leaders who youth can’t vote for today may send them to war tomorrow. Youth shouldn’t be held to a stricter standard than [that for] adults….intelligence and maturity should not be the basis upon which the right to vote [rests upon]. Lowering the voting age should be the just and fair way to make things straight,” forum chairperson Bernard Chen concluded.

Videos of the forum can be viewed here.



24 Responses to “Youths call for right to vote at Youthquake forum”

  1. […] like sylvia lim says – its almost a ‘gimmick’ hahaha. anyhow: the report from onlinecitizen so that’s there and i find myself commitment-free for the first time in months; no more […]

  2. Robert HO said


    1. I would postulate for readers’ consideration that winning 82 out of 84 seats in Parliament is mathematically, politically, electorally, IMPOSSIBLE without cheating.

    2. For real, actual, proof of LIE KY LHL PAP stuffing fake PAP votes into 10 fake ballot boxes to win the 1997 Cheng San GRC election, visit my blog/s.

    3. Note that Cheng San GRC ‘disappeared’ after 1997. LIE KY LHL PAP knew they would lose again and so ensured Cheng San disappeared from the electoral boundaries.

  3. Gary Teoh said

    I heard from coffeshop talk they did add 10 boxes, but on that particular day, WP candidates should object and recount the total votes.After so many years,no more prove.Anyway,Cheng San is no more bcos they play dirty tricks.This time around, voters are more mature, they might lose a few GRCs. LKY will cry and get heart attack.

  4. Robert HO said

    Dear Gary TEOH,

    1. According to election laws, no more boxes or additional ballots may be added to be counted ONCE COUNTING BEGINS.

    2. This is, of course, to prevent such cheating. But the election officials, working under the PM Office, deliberately broke such laws to add and count the extra 10 boxes even though counting had almost completed [the PAP kept asking for recount after recount to buy time to fake the votes].

    3. LIE KY LHL PAP use exactly the same methods as Saddam Hussein, who also won massive ‘landslide’ elections every time. Dictators like to pretend they have the peoples’ mandate and quite stupidly cheat so blatantly nobody believes them, like our 82 out of 84 Parliament seats going to the PAP. This 82/84 ‘landslide’ is mathematically, politically, electorally IMPOSSIBLE without massive cheating.

  5. The Inquisitor said


    I attended the forum and I DO NOT support the right to vote at 18. Heck, I would not even trust Singaporeans with the responsibility to vote at 21.

    His Eminence
    Politically Conservative Singaporeans

    (Sorry, to use your blog to do some shameless advertising. :D)

  6. Jackson said

    I think given the current society trends, I still see most of 18-yr olds not sensible enough. Instead of supporting the proposal of voting at age 18, I will propose that the elections be held every 3-4 yrs instead of the usual 5.

  7. How conveniently ‘uncle’ Ho (ie. Andy Ho of ST) forgets to appropriately credit the ‘source of his inspiration’ for his commentary on reducing the voting age to 18 in Singapore…

    Page 23, 8th May 2008, Straits Times

    Such cheap journalism, wonder how anyone can take him seriously, yucks! I suggest everyone to forward this irrefutable evidence to everyone else. The dates of the event and his commentary are plain to see and only fools would consider it a coincidence.

  8. bubbagump said

    the first line of the Andy Ho column says: “A recent public forum about youth concerns raised the issue of lowering the voting age to 18.”

    It’s not properly credited, as in it doesn’t name the forum, but he certainly isn’t trying to claim the idea as his own. So why the need for: “The dates of the event and his commentary are plain to see and only fools would consider it a coincidence.”?

  9. ClelfCalliggill said

    How to shop for Super Viagra Online

    Purchase Generic Viagra online just makes sense. It’s speedy, prompt, and altogether anonymous. The Viagradelivered to your home or business in a characterless package. No annoying trips to the doctor or pharmacist.

    Step One: Do Research

    A while ago purchasing Brand Viagra (sildenafil citrate) online, you necessitate to make sure that Viagra’s right for you. Visit Pfizer’s authorized Super Viagrasite and read for microscopic information on the drug, including mayhap dangerous drug liaison. If you are captivating any cure or have any health problems, you should deal with your family doctor or pharmacist before getGeneric Viagraonline.

    Step Two: Determine a reliable Online Pharmacy

    Undeniably, you need to line-up a honourable online pharmacy to purchaseyour [url=]cheap viagra with discounts[/url]. They offer an honest reliable service, US licensed physicians and pharmacists for your Brand Viagramodus operandi, and sell only 100% valid Cheap Viagra.

  10. Masterrofilm said

    Hello. Today I have removed the the first amateur roller. It left very ridiculous. I wish to share with you my creation. Look, please and tell over what still it is necessary to work. If there are on professional cameramen to you I will be very grateful for a practical advice.

  11. wheeptGer said

    Hello. It is test.

  12. Mideyo said

    How to shop for Brand Viagra Online

    Acquire Brand Viagra online just makes sense. It”s close, judicious, and heart and soul anonymous. The Cheap Viagradelivered to your territory or employment in a indeterminate package. No detestable trips to the doctor or pharmacist.

    Step One: Do Research

    In advance purchasing Brand Viagra (sildenafil citrate) online, you entail to make sure that Viagra”s right for you. Call on Pfizer”s authorized Viagrasite and read for meticulous information on the physic, including mayhap dangerous drug contact. If you are enchanting any drug or have any health problems, you should conciliate with your family doctor or pharmacist before purchaseCheap Viagraonline.

    Step Two: Optate a honourable Online Pharmacy

    Distinctly, you need to line-up a dependable online pharmacy to getyour discount viagra. They offer an good reliable service, US licensed physicians and pharmacists for your Super Viagraingredients, and sell only 100% absolute Generic

  13. Preetrele said

    Hi. I on numerous occasions be familiar with this forum. This is the head together unqualified to ask a topic.
    How multifarious in this forum are references progressive behind, artful users?
    Can I depute all the communication that there is?

  14. Pharm60 said

    Very nice site!
    [url=]cheap cialis[/url]

  15. RootteLer said

    I’m the only one in this world. Can please someone join me in this life? Or maybe death…

  16. Cederash said

    Побольше б таких штук

  17. Ferinannnd said

    Отличный пост – слов нет. Спасибо.

  18. Avertedd said

    Зер гуд ставлю 5 балов.

  19. ybizmo said

    Im not hard. I got me that his family that miley cyrus shower she. I found.

  20. [url=][img][/img][/url]

    [b]Stop wasting money on Sat TV[/b] [url=][b]Internet Tv[/b][/url] channel hack software

    The International and Local programs noted below are superior conventional TV receptional services, because unlike our competition, we offer more for less…

    [b]Worth Noting…[/b] – The online hd tv software was researched and published on the Beryl Zyskind Internet Trend report of 2010 and is is displayed on [url=][b]Boston Business Journal[/b][/url]

    * Available in any language and any country (including the USA)
    * No extra hardware or TV card required or needed
    * High definition (HD) with crystal clear quality and sound
    * No credit check required
    * Free lifetime software updates
    * Satellite TV Feeds on PC works with Windows®, Mac and Linux OS systems
    * Adult channels for ages 18+ included for free (no pay-per-view fees)
    * Watch TV online anytime, anywhere, anyplace, 24 hours, 7 days

    Enjoy Online Television via… [url=][b]International TV[/b][/url] software and service internet site or you can read more about our [url=][b]Live TV Channel Software[/b][/url]

  21. Добрый день, предлогаю купить настроенные аккаунты в гугле эдворсе с балансом 3400 руб. всего за 1500 руб.
    Или преобрести купоны гугла эдвордса за 500 руб. номиналом 3100 руб. С нами Выгодно, желаем и в дальнейшем сотрудничать с вами.
    ICQ 486. 738. 075.

  22. PaniSex is your ultimate source for free sex personals, adult dating, amateurs & swingers.
    Being the world’s largest adult sex and swingers site, you can find new hookups with the hottest singles and wildest couples.
    Whether you’re looking for sex chat, nude webcams, swinger action, group sex or free adult personals, you’ll get it on PaniSex.
    Turn your wildest fantasies into reality. Join PaniSex today and make love tonight.

  23. ChedChare said

    Man .. Excellent .. Wonderful .. I will bookmark your website and take the feeds additionallyI’m happy to search out a lot of helpful information here in the put up, we want work out extra strategies in this regard, thanks for sharing. . . . . .

  24. BeladonnaBella said

    Thank you so much for this site , finally found what I was looking for !
    click on the [url = Get an individual diet [/ url]

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: